Saturday, January 13, 2018

poems

i want
readers
and humans
all over the world
to understand my
insanity
and my
loneliness
here in the middle of the night
in early January
of the year
2018.

i am parked in front of a keyboard here
eating a bag of salty  potato chips
guzzling this bad
ice cold
ice tea
(its not romatnic like alcohol, i know
but i cannot afford any alcohol)
and wishing i was
in Spain
like always
at a
bull ring.

i am sometimes afraid
that poetry and
stories have lost
their meaning in this world
as she is today.
the Internet has taken over
everything
and silence,
even though we are all
more alone
than ever before,
is somehow also
impossible
to find.

I want silence again, sometimes.
i want an empty room again, sometimes.
Just a typewriter again, sometimes.
No internet connection, no satellite TV,
No fucking 300 channels,
no music videos
no nothing sometimes.

yes i will confess i am a
sentimental loser
like all the rest and
i yearn for that loneliness of what
1945 must have felt like.
sitting in some cramped room
with just a shitty telephone
and a radio with the Dodgers game on it
eating potato chips
drinking iced tea
but in a different way back then.
in a much different
way
back then.

Stories are   weird now
its like all our heads
got holes in them
and they plugged the machines in.
poetry   just don’t seem  to have
as much use
sometimes
in the age of the
Internet.

people dont write poems now,kid…
people write
code now.
people stare into dark screens
writing HTML and c++
Typing commands
strange
indescribable commands
in languages
that are .. not..spoken….

people are speaking in codes now
not in languages.
maybe another 500 years from now,
languages won’t even exist like we
know them today.

everything will just be
an abbreviation.
Some chump kid will pull this poem
out at a library
(assuming this poem will
survive anywhere)
and he will
not know what he is seeing
as he
reads it..

“da fuck is this old code?” he will think,
and throw the book
over his shoulder
into the trash….

I sometimes shake with Fear really
as i imagine it.
i want the past like
all the rest of you fucking saps.
i want the comfort of the past
of the 50s
the 60s
the 70s
the 80s
the 90s.
i know every fucking thing that happened
in those decades,
because the Computer
told me.

Alas here i am
listening to the rain
a cold January night
early january
scratching my ear
and a pimple on my ass
listening to this
little
fucking
laptop
hum
trying to get a new version
of Linux
installed
trying to log on
to some
VR game

writing a poem
as i wait….

    EE Cummings wrote poems for life.
 Do those of us in the 21st century
   just write them
 while
we
wait?

I guess thats what i wonder y’know?

Wednesday, January 3, 2018

fantasy woes

Many people don't seem to see the worth in fantasy writing. They think it's ridiculous, and beyond that, they most definitely think it is childish. For a long time, I guess I felt "similar": I became a reader of classics, by Mark Twain and Hemingway, instead of engaging myself with fantasy. In fact, for a number of years, I even talked smack, every chance I could, about my friends who were still very obsessed with fantasy worlds. They did not seem like "artists" to me, these friends, but rather just "consumers". I.e. Fantasy was a product at the shopping mall, in a video game or in a recent film, and so that was why they liked it. They did not read "real books", only Game of Thrones, and this really aggravated me.

Then, however, my interest in fantasy, for some odd reason, found itself being reignited again. I think one big reason was because of how similar I started to realize fantasy stories were to normal stories, which was a kind of strange realization. For example, most people, in my experience, tend to categorize fantasy stories, as though they're literally being created (and not just based) on some other planet, entirely. They put them in this category of genre that, they're convinced, is for some reason not capable of evoking the same "deep imagery" as a writer like Twain or Hemingway, with their stories of reality. But then, one day, I got to really thinking about something: Considering Hemingway wrote stories set in an early 20th century past I'll never know, is he not just as much of a fantasy writer, to me, personally, as someone like Michael Moorcock? I mean, next to nothing written in the Hemingway classics is something that I can do in my own life. Therefore, it's just as much of a "fantasy" as Frodo and Samwise walking along in the Shire, wouldn't you say?

Still, however, I always seem to get a little "sick feeling" in my stomach, when I again step back and realize that I fell into the fantasy writing again, because it always makes me feel like I'm some sort of idiot,and fool. Another thing it makes me feel -- and this is even worse -- is that, if I try to publish both fantasy stories and real stories, would it even be possible? This is really the biggest struggle of all, I think, for many writers, whether they realize it or not: Can people ever take a fantasy writer seriously, if he then, later on, starts trying to write some tales of reality? Consider, after all, reading something from JRR Tolkien, the Lord of the Rings author, that wasn't about Mordor, but rather about his own reality. Would anyone even be interested? It literally seems impossible to imagine. It's like every author can only be fantasy, or reality, and nothng in between. But how annoying this  truly is!

Speaking for myself, I seem to very much like switching between both, and I would love to be able to have that privilege, but I sometimes just don't know if it is possible, and I sometimes think it is my big fear. For example, if the first text I was to ever get published, was a fantasy text, is it going to mean that I'll never write tales of reality, ever again? This would be a terrible thing for me, but it seems like it would be what wound up happening. And of course the same would go, in the opposite direction, if my first published tale was a "real" tale. I also then wonder if I could publish a collection of short and even unfinished tales, where half are fantasy and half are not. Would readers find this bewildering? Are they unable to turn from one page that details the history of a dwarf, to the next page that details the history of my Little Italy neighborhood? Is it really this difficult for the rest of you out there, to switch genres like this???

Who knows. Just some thoughts...

### Fantasy


Why I worship Madonna Ciccone

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Tuesday, January 2, 2018

The secret of learning languages? Sadness

I have been convinced since I learned Italian, that the real reason I wound up being able to learn it, was actually down to something very simple: It was my sadness. 

But what do I mean, my sadness? What was I sad about that prompted me to learn Italian exactly? To give as much effort and time as I needed to, to this language? What threw me into the "embrace" of Italy, pretty much a perfect stranger to me at the time?

Most people I meet who realize that I can talk Italian pretty well, after being mostly "self taught", usually chalk it up to me being intelligent, or particularly motivated. They might think it has something to do with me having a "gift" for another language, or even a particular love for Italy. I suppose it all has a little to do with everything, but whenever I really dwell on it these days, years later, I always just think that same thing: I flourished in the Italian language, because I was as sad as could be, at that period in my life. Not just sad either, but also tragically lonely. As in, when I started learning Italian, I had no girlfriend, and no friends whom I was really in contact with on the daily.

This might not seem like an important factor when it comes to learning a language, but in my opinion, it actually is, for a few reasons. For starters, when you're learning a language, it's very important that you are able to give as much of yourself over to it, as often as you can. Giving yourself over to something, of course, is pretty hard to do, if you have tons of people you are always talking to in English (or whatever your native language is). It is also pretty hard to do, if there are a lot of things you enjoy in English, like music, films, and books, etc.

When I started with Italian, I wasn't really in a period of heavy reading or writing, like I am now. Instead, I was still in my period of poetry and music. I used to listen to records, and pretty old ones at that, pretty much around the clock. Bob Dylan, Bruce Springsteen, and old black blues artists were pretty much my best -- and only--friends.

The trick, however, was that, by the point I started with Italian, I had been listening to those artists for literally years. I knew all their songs by heart, and was probably a bit tired of re-playing them. I needed something new; but I didn't really know what, exactly. I have never liked new modern music to the point of being filled with passion, and yet I didn't know where else to look for a thrill. I was lonely, like I say, and now I didn't even have my recvords to keep me occupied. I also wasn't going to go out and search for friends or a woman, cause that's just...too hard! Plus, there was that other major detail about searching for friends and a woman: If I did it, I would have to do it in English, and even then, it was almost as though English was just making me sad. Mostly, I think, because my whole own narrative of tragedy, by then, had already played out in it.

Sometimes I look back at my learning of Italian and I really see it as though I was "resurrected" in some way., and that a huge part of my "English self" died. I also really often think that , if I hadn't of learned the language, I might not have made it to today. I think I would be deceased. And, not surprisingly, I am often most reminded of how I feel the Italian language "saved my life", whenever I get very sad these days, years later, too. Because guess what the first thing I always do is, when I am having a bad night here in the USA, nowadays? That's right: I start reading in Italian, or watching something in it, listening to it, etc. It's as though the language has now become this escape hatch from reality.

 When I am thinking in Italian, I feel so very far from everything and everyone I have ever known. And this is not an upsetting feeling. If anything, it's downright relieving. None of the people who I feel ever hurt me, or betrayed me, or cheated me, etc., none of them, more likely than not, will ever experience , what I have experienced, in this other language. There is essentially no chance in hell, that they'll ever hear the same sad songs I have heard in it, or see the same movies, or know the same characters, etc. From an American standpoint, in this little New Jersey town, it's all very much like everything in Italian is just "for me".

Who else here knows Fabrizio DeAndre, or Jovanotti, or Vasco Rossi, etc? Nobody.They're all just for me, and there is something very relieving about that to me. It's like this experience I have solely for myself. No one can "intrude". None of the wicked people of my life, that I feel hurt me over the years, have ever said the words in this language. This language, you see, is actually almost "purified" in my mind. I have watched movies where people scream in it as they are killed...but in my reality,  the language exists in some very "protected" place. It's like a piece of jewelry that you nevr want to put on, because you're afraid you might lose it. Englihs of course does not have this for me: In my reality, it has been being used by everyone and anyone, for all my life. The worst people have spoken to me in it. My uncle has belittled me and degraded me in it, called me a loser and a moron. I have had my heart broken in it. I have been threatend with death in it. I have been forced to read terrible books in it, or to read boring documents in it . I have been handed out detention slips and suspension slips in it, been accosted by lunatic American cops in it.

Italian, yes, I've had some experiences in it, sure, and read many things, but not nearly as many as my own tongue. Again, it's mostly just totally pure. It's an art language to me. Most days I hear it, I am only listening to it in songs, or silly films. And when I hear it, I never, at all, have to be reminded of anyone from my reality....

This part about how I never have to be reminded of anyone from my past,  is really more incredible than most people think. Take, for example, something like the Boston accent. Years ago, I had a girl I dated whose mother was from Boston, and she had a very, very strong accent. As a result of this, whenever I hear it, I am obviously instantly reminded first of the mother, and then of the girl. I had many bad experiences with the girl: I do not like remembering her. Well, now imagine that I am sitting down for the night to watch a fun movie, and halfway through it, at the saddest scene, a character enters in with a slight Boston accent. What do you think I feel? I was already at the sad scene in the film, and now I've just been reminded of this old character and all the stuff that came with her. So maybe I wind up turning te film off, listenign to sad songs, and descending for the rest of the night into a deep, dark misery. All the dark, rotted past is instantly brought to the surface. I am swimming in a sea of bones and death.

Now though, imagine I am watching the exact same film ..but it has been dubbed or doppiato , in Italian. Guess what? I never have that moment of being reminded of my ex-girlfriend. She cannot possibly enter in , for there is literally no one in this language who sounds anything even remotely like her. And don't just think that this sort of thing applies only to Boston accents or  big things like that, cause it doesn't. It goes with anything...it could even be a little bit of slang or something like that. For example, take something like the word joint or blunt, to describe how you'd smoke marijuana. I don't think as deeply about those words as I do about my ex's mama with the accent, but somewhere in my brain, I cannot help but think that maybe, after years of hearing joint and blunt get passed around, I probably have a lot of mental associations with the words. Joint, for instance, seems to make me remember this old head shop my buddies and I used to go to, and blunt makes me remember many a day hanging around near the corner store, when I was 16. Now, look at the word that is usually used in Italian, to describe a joint or a blunt: Un cannone. It looks like cannon (doesn't much sound like it) but beyond that, I have literally no personal associations attached to it. What happens because of this, I feel, is that the word almost  has a totally seperate definition for me. I hear an Italian kid tell me he's gonna smoke a cannone, and I don't remember the kid Andy K, or Joey, from my youth. 

A lot of people think learning a language is worthwhile, because they want to meet new people and travel. This was my initial desire, too. I thought it would be really cool to know one, and I thought thats why I was doing it. These days, though, I often just realize, as I say, that learning the language isn't necessarily about new people, so much as it is about dumping the old people right out of your brain. I honestly do not htink there is any better re-invention that can possibly occur for the self, beyond language learning.

Many people nevr realize the beauty of language learning, however, becase so many of them are really, I wold imagine, happier than I ever was. As a result, they wind up staying "contentedly" in their original language box. Their few friends, for instance, that they talk to on the daily, probably sorta keep them locked in it, and they do not realize. This is what takes me back to what I said way before...when I mentioned how I started learning Italian when I had no friends and no girlfriend. Basically, if I had someone in my life back then who I texted or talked to often, in English, my mind would have kept getting constantly pulled back into English land. Since I had nobody, I literally just rolled off into a sea of Italian strangers who began texting me, constantly, and it was like they "re-created" my brain. I did not just study Italian, after all, in books like I was at class. I literally got lost inside of it, in every way someone can: At one point, almost all the people I talked to for a long while daily, were Italians, everything I watched was strictly Italian, and everything I listened to, was also 3/4 Italian. No one ever came and pulled me back into English. I had no one to do that for me.

These days, alas, years later, and things have changed  a bit. Mostly they have really only changed just because of one individual person, that being Gina, whom I have often referenced in my texts. Gina is someone I talk to every day and, though she is an Italo-American, she does not speak Italian, and will probably never learn it. I met her aftr I had already learned the language sufficiently, and she basically started talking to me daily...on text... a habit that continues to this day. I enjoy our conversations very much, in a way I Never enjoyed anyone elses in the English language. In many ways, Gina reminds me of the joy I felt talking to Italian women -- and this is really saying something. I can, I'll admit, see myself marrying Gina.. I am desperately interested in her. The problem ,o f course, as my other texts will attest, is that Gina is not nearly as interested in me, as I am in her. She goes away sometimes, oftentimes, even. She does not write me for many hours. She does not call when she says she will. She never comes to get me, even after swearing she will. I get lonely...

And like I said already, guess what happens when I do? I find myself curiously gravitating, every time, back towards Italian land, like old times. This is especialyl the case, I now always find, if I am very upset with Gina. If I am only a little upset and sad, I might just write (like now), or maybe I will read, in English. When I'm severely hit, though, I always wind up in Italian land, and I guess I just find this very curious. I also find it kind of aggravating because... it's almost becoming this situation where, maybe if I could just disconnect myself from Gina completely, I could perhaps re-enter back into that Italian world, for the majority of my time. I could go there and, I could be alright again, and resurrect myself again, as I did when I first learned it. Because, of course, that is the other truth about the resurrection that the language grants you: Not only do you forget everyone else from your dark past, but you also forget even your own self. 

My interests in Italian somewhat mirrored my interests in English, at times, but then again, not really. Italian changed many things about me, because many things were oddly tolerable in Italian, in ways they never were in English. Take, for example, something silly, like a happy go lucky cartoon. In English, I generally don't watch cartoons: It seems kind of childish, and like a dreadful waste of time. I don't feel bad watching them, like I feel bad hearing Boston accents, but I still feel like I could be doing something better. In Italian? Suddenly the happy go lucky cartoon seems totally acceptable. Therefore, I get to breathe in all of its soothing, childish nature--without feeling any of the attached guilt. This little gift goes right across the board of course: Not only can I tolerate cartoons in Italian without guilt, but I can also tolerate bad womens' talk shows, funny movies, stupid pop music, and even ridiculous people on Twitter, who would probably drive me insane in English, but who somehow delight me in Italian. You see what I mean? The whole world is flipped upside down in another language. I'm a considerably happy person in Italian...because I'm essentially like a bit of a child still in it. In English, I'm a miserable old writer, pondering so many troubling things....

----NOTES
LANGUAGES









ponderings on the Deep South

Are Southerners basically third worlders?

It is a question I often ask myself, and one which I try to approach from a multitude of different angles. It's also one which, after many years of pondering it, I think can be responded to with a basic "Yes, I think they basically are". But why?

My reasoning is very simple: Not only are Southerners in the USA particularly brutal, just like 3rd worlders are, in the sense that they value strength over intellect and weapons over compromise (not to mention prison over hospitals), but the other thing that makes the Southerners seem so dreadfully "third world-esque" is the fact that, just like their culture seems so lacking in intellect, so too does it seem very lacking in just plain old imagination. 

American southerners are very peculiar people to me because they actually, in some respects, are even more unimaginative, generally speaking, than most actual 3rd worlders - from, say, Kenya, or Venezuela -- tend to be. One thing people don't understand about the 3rd world culture is that, one big reason it's so terrible, is because it has no idea how to get outside of itself, or to even imagine a world outside of itself. It is literally that poor. It's like you're in a room with no windows, no computer, and no books. You don't even realize you're in a prison, basically.

The Deep South isn't as bad as Kenya, but it's pretty close,  it's 3rd world as far as I see it, and there are a few reasons I say this. For starters, let's examine what, in terms of culture, tends to "sell" in the Deep South. Guess what it usually is? I'll tell you: Only stuff that the Southerners feel represents them and theirs. Southerners are literally the only group in the entire country, and perhaps the entire developed world, who are so obsessed with their own mirror reflection, in terms of the media they want to take in. Southerners have their own exclusive country music, their own movie genre that they obsess over collectively (the Western, ironically), and they also have their own sense of fashion. They all seem obsessed with the exact same handful of things.

Believe it or not but, globally speaking, and especially in terms of the developed First world, all of these traits are pretty god damn rare. Most people in developed countries, in the 21st century, have their own culture, sure, but they tend to not be obsessed with it, and oftentimes, they tend to hardly even pay any attention at all to it, in terms of media. People from Washington State, in the Pacific Northwest, don't obsess, endlessly, over only digging musicians that come from Washington State, and sing songs about the Northwest. Generally speaking, people from France and Spain , et cetera, are the exact same way. No one in those places cares to only hear about the place they're from, in every single thing they do.

Again, I stress: This is the sign of a 3rd world mindset, because the disease of the 3rd world mind is that it is literally so poor that it cannot travel, even imaginatively, outside of itself. England, for example, gave the English language highly imaginative fantasy stories like Alice in Wonderland, Peter Pan, Lord of the Rings, and Harry Potter -- and then even bands like the Beatles-- because England was forward, and progressive. England saw far outside of itself. Notice what the South did with rock and roll, however, once it was handed back to them, by the English, as I always say: They debuted Lynyrd Skynrd, a band that talks endlessly of the South, and then they even created a genre called "southern rock". 

French people write rock music, Italians write it, and so do Mexicans write tons of it. Yet no one hsa ever coined the phrase "Mexican rock" as though it's an actual separate genre.  Even the English rock acts do not refer to their music as "English rock". Everyone who writes  rock music does it for the same reason: They want to be globalized, and they want to fly on airplanes all around the world, playing rock songs. They want to escape imaginary borders and flags. They want to be accepted on a global worldwide, scale. Not just in the "South".

In fact, for all the crap that North Americans talk of the Latin Americans, the folks down below Texas in countries like Mexico, Peru, Colombia, and so forth, are able to extend their worldview shockingly far, in comparison to most N. Americans, but especially in comparison to Southerners. People in Peru are distinctly aware that there is a world outside of Peru. They don't expect, nor even want, to hear only about Peru, in every single song they listen to. They don't care to only watch television programs set in Peru. Southerners from the States do want all of this.

My basic opinion, in fact, is that the American southerners are basically like insulated "common" Americans -- many Americans are insulated,in some way,  after all -- but without all the benefits: Someone from New York or California is often convinced that the US is the best, just like a patriotic Kentucky boy, but at least someone in NY or Cali is experiencing an incredibly vibrant area, literally brimming over with all sorts of interesting things. The Southerner is instead living in an impoverished area, very much like a Peruvian or a Colombian-- make no mistake about it -- and yet,a t the same time, he is still convinced it's the best place ever, and he feels he has no reason to look anywhere else. He hates the liberal north, so he can't go there, but he also hates the entire world outside the USA, too. Get what I mean? It's like a Mexican sitting in Mexico thinking they're in the best country in the world. It's not just ignorant, it's also pretty dangerous, cause it simply isn't true! If Mexico believed that about itself, which I can assure you, she does not, it would be very bad, because Mexico would never wind up improving. Instead, Mexicans are always looking abroad, in both media and reality and music, and this will lead to Mexico improving, instead of declining. The Deep South states simply don't do this. Again, just look at their standard media. It's painfully obvious that these people are dreadfully insulated.

 Southerners are filled with all sorts of arrogance that, in a large way, they never earned the right to have. It's like they're drinking north country lemonade , thinking it's their own, but it ain't. It also probably doesn't help that many of them seem to be convinced that Texas has something to do with them, which it most definitely does not. Texas is still a bit in the past, yea yea, but make no mistake about it: She is, and has been, slipping liberal in many shocking ways. I predict that Texas will eventually be another type of California or New York, and soon: It will wind up a permanent blue state. Many people seem to think Texas is the "south". It is not. At all. For example, many Texans appreciate country music, and there is a big country scene there, but then, too, there are also many other very vibrant music scenes there as well. I know a dozen people who have moved to Texas. I've never heard of anyone moving to Georgia, or Tennessee. Ever in my life. Texas also hosts the SXSW events for music.

When you're hosting events like that, where peole come from al over the states and the world to hang around in your city,  it's a pretty good indicator you're about to tip Democratic blue, permanently and fast. Then too, consider that other famous resident of Texas, from a little town called Abbott: His name was Willie Nelson...and he's basically the biggest liberal that country music has ever seen. Put him up against the real Deep South country artists and there's no comparison. Willie Nelson has collaborated with Snoop Dogg. You ain't gonna get that from some cowboy artist raised in Georgia or Mississippi. Those guys are all, instead, totally insulated...in their own little Deep South world. I say it all the time: Brad Paisley, from West Virginia, and Charlie Daniels, from North Carolina, literally have no widespread hopes at all, like Willie Nelson did and still does. They don't even seem to want to have widespread hopes; they are entirely content, it would seem, with just a Deep South fanbase. 

People all over the USA Recognize Willie Nelson. Ask them about Charlie Daniels or Brad Paisley...no one has a clue who you're talking about, outside the South. This is a sign that the South has literally collapsed in on itself, in a way that is, shockingly, even worse than it used to be. Look at Elvis Presley, for example, born in Mississippi. In the 1950s, he obviously had nation wide and then global range. But nothing about Elvis's music seems "distinctly" southern to anyone. The South was not Elvis Presley's sole topic of singing. The South was not literally smeared over every one of his songs. With Charlie Daniels and Brad Paisley, it most definitely is. These artists are incomprehensible outside of the South. And again, they 'think' that this is a good thing, and what they should be aiming for.

What's particularly strange about white southern culture versus, say, the blacks, is that the blacks now seem oddly ahead of the Southerners in many respects. In fact, they have seemed ahead of them for quite awhile now. Consider, in the first place, that blacks are all politically liberal, which is a sign of being first world and developed, and then also consider that black southerners tend to know tons of black northerners, and they also tend to make music that, though it is often filled with regional obsessions, still manages to go global, regardless. Blacks are not filled with any of that same, asinine arrogance that has so destroyed the Southern white man, and left him crippled: They look outside their own house, all the time, and they take influence and inspiration from outside, often. The "southern white" simply refuses to do this ... and as a result, he is being totally left in the dust. Just like a 3rd worlder would be...

### notes

Music genre prisons..short reflections

I didn't stop writing songs because I thought I was a bad songwriter. It was because I do not think many communities are more disagreeable, or more prejudiced and close minded, than the songwriting and music community at large. It's a point I go back to again and again: Few art forms are more "imprisoned" than music currently is, underneath the present day cultural "rules".

At first glance, the musical prison is hard to see, especially if you are not actually interested in being a musician. This is because, as a fan, you literally have all the freedom in the world, to choose what "type" of music you want to hear. As a teenager and a college student, you might feel compelled to ally yourself w/ one genre or other in specific, but as an adult, alone with your computer, you probably listen to whatever you want, switching genres constantly. Switching genres of course, is as normal as switching moods. Anyone who thinks they are "special" for listening to all the genres is ... really a bit of a hack. It'd be like thinking you were special for waking up happy one day, and sad the next, instead of eternally happy. It isn't special. It's just normal.

The issue of course is that pop culture only allows this freedom for the fans, and not for the artists. Music artists are literally forced into a prison of not just genre, but often even certain moods, if they want to make it. Metal bands don't just represent loud, fast songs...they also represent the mood of "anger". Hip hoppers represent the streets, but they also represent a sort of "elegance" and "motivation" for wealth, or fast cars. As for your basic pop stars, they tend to represent a mood of a carefree weekend night, of dancing,of general silly happiness. All of this is actually beyond poisonous. Not because any of the moods are inherently bad, but rather because the artists get themselves trapped in them.

As I often try to stress, it seems like it has always been like this, but it's not really the case. When record stores first started to pop up and become "hip" places, most musicians were actually composing songs --and hits -- that were all across the mood spectrum. The Rolling Stones have songs that represent literally every mood: In a song like "Gunface", they play a street gangster, in "Jumpin' Jack Flash", they're angry, in "Sympathy for the Devil", they're religious and politicaly intelligent, in "Wild Horses", they're loving, countrified, and calm. They bounced all over the place, in a way that 3/4 of the new musicians now, will never do. Ever. Because at some certain point, the prison guards arrived, and they put everyone in a cell. I call it "sterilization". It's the reason music lost its oomph for me. As an artist, I one day woke up with an epiphany: "I am actually not accurately expressing myself any longer, as a songwriter..."

The way I saw it, my freedom of expression had, over the years, become painfully limited, mostly because I started to feel, as time passed, more and more "locked' down in this cell of genre. When I was 18, it was as though I had some flashing moment to make a choice -- a choice of genre--and the one I ultimately wound up choosing was the acoustic guitar. At first, it was funny. But then it became almost sinister. It reached the point where I felt that, if I wanted to write a song with anythign other than an acoustic guitar or a "quiet" electric, no one would know what was going on. My fans...and yes, I did and do have some on YouTube, wouldn't understand what was happening. I can't start a setlist with a metal song, then a reggae song, then a blues, then a hip hop song. What kind of asshole would do this, right? Any artist who would do this...wouldn't they be sort of like a jack of all trades or smoething? A master of none? That's pretty much the idea most people in modern day have.

Yet, again, that was literally exactly what the Rolling Stones did with the genres of their own, earlier time. The reason no one sees this now is because the Stones are just written off as one genre, "rock and roll", but they actually have numerous genres they played with -- all of which are sort of collectively forgotten as having once been genres! The Stones played blues, country, folk, reggae, and their own creation at the time, the 60s rock. What they were doing then very much is totally akin to someone now going from metal, to hip hop, to reggae, etc., as I wrote. The only difference is that now it's considered "impossible", and back then, it wasn't. The chains of genre grew stronger. Why? Simple answer: The audiences insisted upon it, in massive ways.

One has to really try and remember just how new records were in the heyday of the Rolling Stones or any bands like them. Pop music was essentially just a decade old at that point, havaing commenced with Elvis Presley . This meant that there were not "cultural movements" spanning back decades upon decades that all revolved exclusively around one type of genre music or other. In our own time, we have not just genres at the record store, but we also have particular fashions, styles, and "connected interests" that combine with each music genre. For example, people who like metal generally also like horror stories and Viking mythology, and generally dress  in dark colors, fans of the Dead generally like hallucinogenic drugs, and people who like pop generally like light colors, and probably don't know much about Vikings , but love shopping at the mall. Genre turned into something much more than just a way to categorize music at the record store: It also became a way to categorize people, and then to begin actual "gangs" that formed around the music itself.

---end // notes music

Spanish anger

Gina started talking some Spanish rather randomly to me yesterday . It was a great thing for me. I really want to get lost in Spanish world again, as I was for all of October, with my Peruvian friend, but Spanish is a stranger language than I ever imagined it being. I thought it would be easy, since I am essentially fluent in Italian, but the truth is that it is radically different in many ways. It is especially different once you start looking at the version of it spoken on this continent, versus the Old World continent. 

Many people here, for example, even actual Mexicans and Colombians etc., are a bit annoyed - and sometimes maybe a bit "confused" - by how the folks living in actual Spain speak Spanish. 

I have been told this by a few Mexican friends I've talked to now. It isn't so much that the folks in Spain are not understandable--of course not--but rather that it's fairly different, and they use different phrases, and a different sort of "rhythm" too. If you search Google for pirated movies, for example, you will often see, on Spanish pirate sites, that the sites always have 3 versions of the same film to watch: One is in "Catalan", which is for the folks in Spain, the next is in "Latino", obviously for the folks here in Latin America, and the last is often just subtitled, with the original (often English) audio.

I myself, because I learned Italian from a fellow who lives in Florence, Italy, can understand the Catalan significantly better than I can the Latin American stuff. In fact, one of the reasons I first got inspired to try the language, was because I was watching an interview in Italian with an old singer, and the guy giving the interview was talking Spanish, and the singer was replying in Italian. My mind was blown, especially because I basically understood the interviewer. 

WHat I did not realize at the time, though, was that he was speaking in this "Catalan". I quickly came to discover this, once I tried to tune in to various programs from Latin America and couldn't understand a bloody word. My mission at that point became clear: Whenever I start fuckin' with Spanish, I'll fuck with it in its Latin American version. Screw Spain! What care I for Spain? Don't they still have a monarchy? Pendejos!! 

Cracking jokes about Spain is actually part of the great fun of talking to all those folks living below Texas, though, on some real shit. Every time I meet a new friend, I always ask them that question at some point throughout the first night of our conversation: "How do you feel about...Spain?" 

The responses are mixed. Some of them have actually written to me that they hate it.. oh yea...and others are just totally indifferent. Many of them all seem to agree that people in Spain "don't really speak Spanish correctly" though. Which - again - is hilarious. "Tienen acentos extrano..." Translation: they have strange accents!!!! 

I should very much like to live in Latin America if I could, it seems more down my alley as an old Italiano with my tomato sauce and my bread soaked in olive oil and garlic,  but of course the North Americans have essentially done everything in their power to destroy it, and make sure it looks like an absolutely horrifc place. Mostly they have done this via the War on Drugs....in Spanish ... la guerra contro las drogas. It should come as no surprise that the War on Drugs, whilst it has had quite a negative effect on the North American cities , has completely decimated Latin America.  Juarez, for example,is basically hell on Earth.

 Many Latin American countries are regularly rated the most dangerous in the entire world. This is all almost entirely thanks to the US and its tyrannical drug war. You think the black ghetto in Chicago is bad? Go to Juarez. It gets worse. Down there they'll cut your head off in the middle of the street and nobody will be able to do anything about it, because drug lords rule the entire city and have flipped the government on its side. One woman I was talking to in Chihuahua, Mexico (yes, a real place, and its a state in the north, actually) explained to me how "..I don't feel comfortable walking around anywhere here... because I'm afraid I'll be kidnapped by the cartel...and never seen again.." This happens regularly in the world below Texas. 

Again, for an Italian, this whole bit about the gangsters  taking over the city and hanging the government is a bit of a familiar story: My ancestors fled Naples for this exact reason, because the city is not run so much by a stable govt., as she is by gangsters and mafioso. For an Italian,especially a Neapolitan, the idea that any given day, could be the day the government loses total control over the city and it flips into the hands of the gangsters, is not at all difficult to believe. For "y'all" traditional North Americans though, I have often found that this is hard to believe. Essentially 'y'all' seem convinced that your legions of cops, soldiers, DEA agents, federals, and so forth, will be able to contain the mess, eternally. The evidence, however, as far as the War on Drugs is concerned, points elsewhere: The North Americans are losing this war more and more every day. And when I say "losing", I don't mean that more and more of your dumb kids are shooting dope and finding it easier to locate, I mean you're losing control over your own cities and your own states -- just like Juarez already has. Each day that passes, is another day where the power of the gangs continues to grow. If the North American tyrants do not end the war soon, it is totally within reason to think that their cities will collapse, like dominoes, in the same fashion that the Latin ones have. Many of them are already close: Detroit, Saint Louis, Chicago, New Orleans, and a few other N. American cities regularly feature on the same lists of "the wotlds most dangerous", too. You will have an entire nation of shit cities that resemble Naples and Rio de Janeiro and Juarez. All thanks to the War on Drugs.... 

It will be a sad day, indeed, the day I talk to an American girl, and I get the same story that I got from the Mexican one, about how she's too afraid to go walking outside, for fear that some local drug lord, who has murdered the Mayor, is going to kidnap her, to rape her to death. But alas, I don't suppose I myself will be doing much talking either at that point. 

And isn't it sad that a conversation that began about the beauty of the Spanish language turned into this??? Gotta hand it to the United States tyrants. They sure do know how to ruin everyhing good in the world. Tyrannical fucking pendejos.