Where did the myth that women are more "suited" for monogamy than men come from, exactly -- and how is it possible that people could still believe it -- at all -- in the 21st century? Shouldn't it be obvious by now that women, though they might be easier to trap in a monogamous relationship than men, are not actually all that interested in one, deep down?
One need only look at simple facts to see the Truth about women throughout the centuries: When break-ups happen in the modern day, who is generally able to be guaranteed a lay, or even a whole new long term monogamous relationship, faster? The truth is , and for some time always has been, women.
Women, unlike men, have generally *always* had a bit of a license to move very quickly through many different areas of society and culture, and get themselves warmly *greeted* in any room they might think to show up at. Yes, it's true, the greeting often turns cold very quickly, and they often wind up, as I said before, *trapped* in certain rooms, and this was especially the case in the deep past, but it doesn't change the fact that women are still, when given the chance, able to switch rooms much more quickly than men. And this very fact, of course, is what gives them and the obnoxious myth about them being "more monogamous" away. Not only are women not more monogamous, but they are usually considerably more focused on sex than any man ever could be.
One need only look at Internet pornography, in my opinion, to understand the truth about women. A racy thing to type, I know, but still one can't help but notice how little anyone out there seems to care -- men or women -- for the men who pass through the screen, during a porn shoot. The image of men in a pornographic film is often what I call a "half image" -- and sometimes it is not even that....sometimes it is naught more than a mere "shadow". For all the talk of how a woman in our society is only taken to be "tits and ass", the truth is that men in pornographic films are always, as a general rule, merely faceless animals with enormous semen spewing cocks.
The women in porn, however, are, as we all know, stars, and by being stars, they are often also "complete". They are not shadows. They are not half-figures. They are not, in fact, merely tits and an ass. They are neck, shoulders, hair, eyes, lips, feet, legs, thighs, and so on. For men -- especially, say, in a gangbang -- the same simply cannot be said, no matter what your queer Harvard professor tells you. And this of course leads us to the other truth of our species that so many modern thieves cannot accept: The general reason that there is really no porn where men are gangbanged by a group of women is because no man really wants to be,believe it or not. Why not? Because men, again I stress, see the "whole picture". Always. If a man were to be gangbanged by a group of 12 women, there is a definite chance one of them might be fat, or ugly, or weird looking. He thus has no interest in it. It is simply too risky for a man to lay with an ugly woman.
There has always been something particularly mortifting about an ugly woman, for as long as this world can remember. They have never been written about by any poet, Shakespeare completely avoids even making reference to the fact that they exist, and there are hardly even any portraits painted of them. Also, take note of a successful modern day establishment like Hooters: Even in times of hardship, that company will hesitate to hire an even slightly below par woman. They will go understaff. They may even very well just close their doors entirely, if only ugly women start applying for gigs. This is because Hooters understands the core of our human species: Ugly women are biological gambles. Mistakes of nature.
Women, for all of their bickering, just tend to not have these same standards for men, especially when it comes to faces, which porn displays very clearly to all of us: A man could be missing an eye, have a huge knife scar down his cheek, but have the 6 pack and the enormous cock, and women will flock to him like flies on a flame. A woman with a perfect body and an ugy face would never make it as a porn star. She would be cast off into the dark web of the terrifying city to fend for herself, or work behind the curtains at Walgreens. Or she may very well hope to struggle to use makeup to make herself attractive, at which point she could begin to sneak herself in and perhaps hope to continue her evolutionary line....
No comments:
Post a Comment