If there's one thing that annoys the hell out of me, it's someone who watches a film like Star Wars and can't wait to point out to you, how many plot details could simply "Never be real".
I'm sure my reader knows the type of person to whom I refer. They will cite things like how Star Wars does not obey the laws of physics, because explosions don't really happen in outer space, and no sound can be heard (as it is in the SW world). Then they'll you how scientists, in our world, would never really be able to create something like a lightsaber.
They may insist on pointing out the way in which George Lucas, the creator of SW, merely plundered old stories about samurais and Buddhists and Greek heros, et cetera, to put together the story. Maybe, if they're particularly knowledgeable, they'll point out a major detail, like how George Lucas basically seems to have robbed the 100 plus year old story, John Carter, by Edgar Rice Burroughs.
And of course all of this is not just limited to SW. These jerks can and will enter into any fantasy construct and attempt to dismantle everything. They will see, for example, that a reader is enjoying a story about wizards and vampires, and they'll go on for hours and hours, about just how "not real" such concepts. Why, they ask, bother to read about things that could never be real? Why, why, why?
Personally, and this should come as no surprise to my reader, I have always seen such people as being imaginatively crippled in some way. Like, for some bizarre reason, their imagination shut down, and they have been stranded, in a very depressing way, here in this realm we know as "reality". And what I find most particular about these people is that they seem to think modern science protects their idea of "core reality" (where fantasy stories are simply absurd) when, for me, it has only been adding to the craziness with every passing year of new "real world" discovery.
Take, for example, that detail I pointed out earlier, about how real world scientists here start whining, when they hear sound and see explosions, in the outer space of the Star Wars universe. "What folly!" they scream, "how foolish! Oh I cannot watch it! Har har har. It is just so silly. I'm a real science lover....theres simply no sound in space...and those androids...stupid...and those lightsabers...stupid...and that spaceship isn't obeying the laws of our aerodynamics...stupid!"
Here's what I say to that: There is no sound in our space, and that spaceship is impossible by our laws of aerodynamics --- but what about some othr version of space? For example, the version of space that might exist in some other universe. Another universe that we know literally nothing at all about -- just like we here on Earth hardly know anything about the galaxies outside of the Milky Way. Hell, even with the Milky Way, our own galaxy, we know very little. There are literally billions of planets in the Milky Way alone...and we don't even know if there could be life on Jupiter, which is relatively closeby.
So what makes these people so sure that there could never be sound in outer space?
The real ironic truth about someone who actually reads deeply into "real life space", for example, is that one immediately sees just how vast and limitless the story of our universe has become over the years. Look, for example, back to an imaginary story like War of the Worlds by HG Wells, released in the year 1898. People of that time period knew so little about the Red Planet -- Mars -- that HG Wells was able to easily sell a captivating fantasy story about space aliens living on Mars, who come to attack us. In a year like 1898, the planets of our solar system were known, but not very much "seen". Humanity pretty much had utterly no idea what was outside of our solar system in a year like 1898. We now know for sure that our Mars is desolate and not populated by anyone. In 1898, we had no idea. We saw it but we never saw its surface. For all we knew, somebody was hanging around up there.
So, basically, we knocked out the mystery of Mars ....but once we knocked that mystery out, the only thing that happened was that Jupiter became the next mystery, followed by the galaxy beyond that, et cetera, ad infinitum.
In a way, the entire known universe throughout the frst half othe 20th century, was just this one solar system and this one Milky Way galaxy. Then the 60s happened and we got smarter, and the next thing we know, we start understanding that not only are there more galaxies, but there are literally billions of them. And not only is the universe god damn massive -- but it's actually expanding endlessly at some unfathomable speed. Add to this, we have also now had the 'string theory' idea enter into our consciousness, and string theory (so far as I've read) is the first theory in all of time that proposes the idea that our universe isn't the only one. There are many universes. Hence the new term the "multi-verse". String theory is highly debated within the real science community. Many dignified men of science believe the idea completely.
Some readers might find it bewildering that I began this 'essay' talking about people who dismiss films like Star Wars , and have now commenced to discussing things like string theory. But the reason is simple: Ideas like string theory and the multi-verse theory , suggest to me something that, in truth, I quite like hearing. What it suggests is that the universe is a major mystery. It's like an endless series of bombs going off, every bomb being a mystery that just gets deeper and deeper.
And personally, as someone who was always deeply interested in "mysticism", I find this idea rather comical and relieving. Mostly because I grew up very surrounded by lots of kids who desperately wanted to believe, it always seemed, that science had reached some Enlightenment age, where "all things had been solved and become known". I think this arrogance is/was especially popular in what I now call the "pre-wormhole generations".
Basically, lots of militant atheists types who grew up between, say, the 60s and 90s, before ideas like the multi-verse came into being, and before we realized that the universe is rapidly expanding and infinite, often seem to walk around with this chip on their shoulder, that its all been 'explained'. But again, it hasn't all been explained. If anything, what the most recent scientific discoveries suggest is that all of this is actually much more mysterious than even the mystery lovers previously imagined, decades ago! In the language of the barrio, this universe is fucking strange!
To me, the multi-verse theory in particular, argues in defense of all sorts of ideas that many "rational minds" would consider to be 'occult ideas'. The multi-verse theory can and should be used as a way to discuss all that weird phenomena that so many science freaks out there wouldn't let people enjoy with a straight face, for literally decades. Ghosts, vampires, lightsabers, magic portals, little green men, wizards, explosions in space, giants, even Heaven and Hell, can all fit---rather eerily--within this very expansive and mind boggling 'multi verse' idea.
For example, how can we really know for sure that the myths about ghosts aren't true? It could be the case that, when we die, our consciousness somehow slips off into some other part of the universe, and ghosts are some weird example of that alternatve universe accidentally (or purposely) 'flickering into our own'. And, beyond that, who is to say that a famous story like Star Wars or even that old film Willow, isn't just a story being beamed to our writers from elsewhere, in order to explain to us, all thse other universes, that actually exist somewhere?
You see, when I sit down to watch a fantasy film, I actively think of myself as watching something that, for all I know, actually happened somewhere, in some other galaxy, in some other random stop along the "multi-verse". And so long as the a theory like the multi-verse one exists, my personal opinion is that no one can stop me from having that belief.
Some scientists fear this of course. They're angry, it would seem, about a theory like this one -- because they find it discomforting. They want it all solved , but the truth at this point is that...even if you take away the multi-verse theory, you still can't take away what is, for certain, already our new and incredibly expanded idea of reality. The fact that there are billions and billions of other planets and galaxies is already totally real science. The fact that the universe is endlessly expanding at a monstrous speed is already real science. And even within that "tinier" idea, scienntists have debates over topics like, for example, the sound in space idea that so many Star Wars haters love pointing out.
A quick search on Google will let the reader know that, as it turns out, some physicists just aren't too sure if the laws of physics in our MIlky Way galaxy, apply to every single one of the billion galaxies out there. I mean, we already know that the laws of gravity on Earth don't apply on all the other planets (and certainly not in space) so why would that physics law about sound necessarily apply throughout every single galaxy? It could be that some galaxy very far away operates by a completely different set of physics laws. Note the following from PBS...
"As far as physicists can tell, the cosmos has been playing by the same rulebook since the time of the Big Bang. But could the laws have been different in the past, and could they change in the future? Might different laws prevail in some distant corner of the cosmos?
“It’s not a completely crazy possibility,” says Sean Carroll, a theoretical physicist at Caltech, who points out that, when we ask if the laws of physics are mutable, we’re actually asking two separate questions: First, do the equations of quantum mechanics and gravity change over time and space? And second, do the numerical constants that populate those equations vary?"
Some scientists, I've read, are frightened of the multi-verse theory, because they think it willl make the public "reject science....and lose faith in it..."I don't really see how they've come to the conclusion. For example, if you take myself into account, its clear that I absolutely have tons of "mystic ideas" I like to believe in -- and yes, I am using the multi-verse theory in an attempt to support them 'scientifically --- but, that doesn't change the fact that I trust science, where science has already figured something out. I don't, for instance, have some wild idea about people living on the Moon or on Mars. I trust the science idea that we already know whats on the MOon and Mars, that being nothing. Of course, in some other universe, its quite possible that humans are living on both Mars and Earth, and they came into friendly contact years ago. In some other universe, maybe humans still have tails for some reason, and maybe Planet of the Apes is true, too!
To me, a truly preposterous idea, at this point in time, would be one like many ancestors used to have, when they thought that heaven was immediately above the clouds, or maybe even within the clouds, in our own universe here. This has been disproven and is, indeed, ridiculous. But other ideas haven't been disproven and, therefore, mysticism is still with us, when it comes to those ideas. Case in point: I know heaven ain't in the clouds now, but how the hell you gonna tell me, with a straight face, that you know, for sure, that my "soul" won't just be transferred to some other planet, light years away from here, that is heaven, once I'm gone from this place? The simulation theory, for instance, which cannot be disproven, completely supports the idea of an afterlife. Within simulation theory, my life could end here, and I could wake up lying down next to a massive computer in the year 3456, with my friend slipping a pair of virtual goggles off my head.
"How was the ancestor simulation?"
You see what I mean voyager?????
---notes
